That raise you are waiting for might turn out to be smaller
than you think.
As white-collar workers look forward to base salary increases
for 2006, they shouldn't look further than this year's average 3.7%, according
to projections from Sibson Consulting, a human-resource consultancy unit of
Segal Co. of New York. Sibson examined data from its own clients and from six
studies conducted by other corporate and consulting institutions, surveying a
total of more than 3,000 employers.
Despite the economy's continued growth, increases forecast for
2006 match those from 2005, and only inched up 0.2 percentage point from the
increase seen in 2004.
When there are enough applicants for jobs, companies don't have
to lure new workers, or keep existing employees happy, with wages as tempting as
those they might offer amid fiercer competition.
"Employers base the overall increase in salaries primarily on
the labor market or cost of talent, and there hasn't been a big change in the
labor market, so salary increases are expected to be about like they have been
in recent years," says Sibson Senior Vice President Jim Kochanski. Employees may
also consider other criteria when deciding to leave a job.
Still, workers can take heart that their raises aren't
decreasing, and for most people, layoffs aren't looming. The slow but steady
rise in salaries is likely to continue in the near future. The trend of 3% to 4%
increases becoming the norm could be frustrating for employees, as the rewards
for efficient workers won't be much higher than those for their less capable
counterparts.
Some professionals are likely to fare better than others. This
year, those in the banking and finance and the insurance industries had the
highest merit increases, according to the survey, averaging more than 4%. These
sectors, with manufacturing and services, are projected to top the list again in
2006.
Education workers, who received the lowest raises in 2005, will
most likely find themselves at the bottom of the pile again next year, seeing
their checks swell only 3.2% on average, the study predicts.
Yet overachievers may still have reason to burn the midnight
oil. Some companies are beginning to implement techniques to differentiate the
highest-performing employees from their more lackluster co-workers, and reward
them accordingly. For instance, having more than one manager evaluate staff
makes for more nuanced appraisals, as one supervisor's generous opinion may be
balanced with more moderate views.
"It helps to avoid the 'Lake Wobegon' scenario, where everyone
is above average," says Mr. Kochanski.