The squeeze is on for white-collar workers.
Despite hopes that an improving economy would bolster wages,
salary increases for white-collar workers are stuck at an average 3.4% this year
and are expected to total no more than 3.6% next year, according to
human-resources consulting firm Hewitt Associates.
The skimpy pay raises for the white-collar crowd follow two
prior years of lean increases. After steady 4% and 5% increases during every
year but one in the 1990s, raises for white-collar workers fell to 3.6% in 2002
and 3.4% in 2003, Hewitt notes. "We're in a very underwhelming pay-increase
period," says Peter LeBlanc, senior vice president at Sibson Consulting, a New
York-based human-resources consulting firm.
By contrast, compensation for chief executive officers and
their top lieutenants is still generous. CEOs in office at least two years
received a 7.2% increase in salary and bonus in 2003 to a median of $2,118,000,
according to an analysis of proxy statements for 350 major U.S. corporations
prepared for The Wall Street Journal by Mercer Human Resource Consulting, New
York.
Ira Kay, practice director of compensation consulting at
human-resources consulting firm Watson Wyatt, expects CEO salaries to rise this
year in the range of 5% or 6%, in line with last year. Average CEO base salaries
rose about 6% in 2002 and again in 2003, according to a study by Watson Wyatt of
373 companies in the S&P 500 with the same chief during the period.
What's more, other rewards that continue to sweeten top
executives' compensation packages -- for example, restricted stock and stock
options -- are shrinking for lower-level employees, says Robert M. Fields, a
lawyer based in South Salem, N.Y., who negotiates employment contracts.
Why the pinch? Even in industries that are on the upswing,
companies are feeling pressure to rein in operating costs because of intense
global competition. In addition, many companies are having trouble making
skittish consumers pay more for their products, from televisions to clothes to
cars. Unable to increase revenue through price increases, they are wary of
increasing costs with salary increases. Job growth also has been weaker than
expected.
White-collar workers are defined as "salaried exempt" --
salaried employees who aren't executives and for whom overtime pay isn't
required by the Fair Labor Standards Act -- and by some lights they shouldn't
complain. Further down the corporate ladder, hourly workers have seen a small
decline in the value of their wages since 2003, once inflation is accounted for.
For most hourly workers, real average hourly wages "have gone nowhere over the
past year," says Jared Bernstein, a senior economist at the Economic Policy
Institute in Washington.
Tightening the pinch for white- and blue-collar workers alike
is the continuing high price of gasoline and the rising costs of higher
education and health care.
Though consumer prices overall were just 2.5% higher in
September than a year earlier, and prices of items such as computers, cars and
household appliances fell, Americans now pay about $2 a gallon for regular
unleaded gasoline, compared with an average of $1.56 last year and $1.35 in
2002, according to AAA, the auto association. Tuition at four-year public
universities and colleges is up 10.5% this year over last, according to the
College Board. And the average employee is paying $1,288 in health-care premiums
this year, a nearly 20% increase over last year, according to Hewitt. In 2005,
that figure is expected to rise to $1,481.
When Phil VandenToorn, an accountant for an auto-parts
distributor in Grand Rapids, Mich., and his wife had their first child this
year, their annual health-care premiums were set to rise about 40% to nearly
$6,000 a year. But he got only a 3% raise last year and hasn't gotten one yet
this year, although his employer has promised him one in December. To save
money, he found a cheaper health plan that offers less coverage through Web site
eHealthInsurance.com.
Raises do vary by industry. Salaries for white-collar workers
in insurance rose 3.9% this year and 3.8% in the accounting and legal
businesses, according to Hewitt. But salaries rose just 2.8% in education and 3%
in real estate.
In many sectors, it's harder to get a pay increase when
switching jobs. In April, Midge McCagney, a 54-year-old New Yorker, resigned her
position as a trust associate at Wachovia Corp. where she
earned a salary in the high $50,000-range. All the companies where she has since
interviewed have offered her less. One company offered her $8,000 less annually
for a position that would have required her to work long hours on occasion. She
now earns $18 an hour as a temp at a small investment-management fund, which is
the same rate she earned 10 years ago.
Even when companies are willing to spend on new hires, they
often still squeeze existing employees. Some marketing and advertising
companies, for instance, are offering 10% to 15% salary increases to new hires,
but only 2% to 3% raises to existing employees, says Eric Goodstadt, chief
marketing officer at Management Recruiters International Inc., Philadelphia, a
big recruiter of midlevel professionals. Construction companies are offering 10%
salary increases to grab "the best of the best," in positions such as project
management, but current employees are lucky to get any raise at all, Mr.
Goodstadt says.
Even in businesses where hiring is strong, raises can remain
low because the job market as a whole is mixed. So while pharmaceutical
companies have been hiring a lot of salespeople, raises are small because there
are so many salespeople in weaker industries. "While there are plenty of jobs
for candidates to obtain, there are also enough candidates because people are
coming from other sectors," says Mr. Goodstadt.
To compensate for low base-salary raises among white-collar
staffers, more employers are turning to variable pay programs -- bonuses, for
example -- in which performance-based compensation must be re-earned each year.
This puts the onus on the employee to prove himself rather than guaranteeing him
a raise. Nearly 80% of companies have at least one kind of variable pay plan, an
increase from just 59% in 1995, according to Hewitt. "It's a much safer route
for employers to take," says Hewitt's Ken Abosch.
For employees, "the accountability and stress are going up
while the rewards are going down," says a software developer for Microsoft
Corp. who earns $72,000 a year. He received no raise this year, and his bonus
shrank to $5,000 from $12,000. "Combined with all the cost-cutting measures that
affect employee pay and benefits, it's definitely made people reconsider outside
job offers," he says.